The Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Competency Domains for Clinical Research Professionals

We are working to standardize the competence required of clinical research professionals through the multi-stakeholder Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency.

By establishing a broadly supported set of competencies in core domains, we aim to lead standardization in the clinical trial workforce and support its ongoing development through competence-based education and training.

COMPETENCY DOMAINS

Click the icons below to explore the Harmonized Core Competencies for Clinical Research Professionals developed by the Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency

Clinical Trial Operations (GCPs)

Clinical Trial Operations (GCPs)

Encompasses study management and GCP compliance; safety management (adverse event identification and reporting, postmarket surveillance, and pharmacovigilance), and handling of investigational product.

  • Evaluate the conduct and management of clinical trials within the context of a Clinical Development Plan
  • Describe the roles and responsibilities of the clinical investigation team as defined by GCP guidelines
  • Evaluate the design conduct and documentation of clinical trials as required for compliance with GCP guidelines
  • Compare and contrast the regulations and guidelines of global regulatory bodies relating to the conduct of clinical trials
  • Describe appropriate control, storage, and dispensing of investigational products
  • Differentiate the types of adverse events (AEs) that occur during clinical trials, understand the identification process for AEs, and describe the reporting requirements to institutional review boards/independent ethics committees (IRBs/IECs), sponsors, and regulatory authorities
  • Describe how global regulations and guidelines assure human subject protection and privacy during the conduct of clinical trials
  • Describe the reporting requirements of global regulatory bodies relating to clinical trial conduct
  • Describe the role and process for monitoring of the study
  • Describe the roles and purpose of clinical trial audits
  • Describe the safety reporting requirements of regulatory agencies both pre- and post-approval
  • Describe the various methods by which safety issues are identified and managed during the development and postmarketing phases of clinical research

View Related Training

Communications and Teamwork

Communication and Teamwork

Encompasses all elements of communication within the site and between the site and sponsor, CRO, and regulators. Understanding of teamwork skills necessary for conducting a clinical trial.

  • Discuss the relationship and appropriate communication between sponsor, CRO, and clinical research site
  • Describe the component parts of a traditional scientific publication
  • Effectively communicate the content and relevance of clinical research findings to colleagues, advocacy groups, and the nonscientist community
  • Describe methods necessary to work effectively with multidiscipli

View Related Training

Data Management and Informatics

Data Management and Informatics

Encompasses how data are acquired and managed during a clinical trial, including source data, data entry, queries, quality control, and correction and the concept of a locked database.

  • Describe the role that biostatistics and informatics serve in biomedical and public health research
  • Describe the typical flow of data throughout a clinical trial
  • Summarize the process of electronic data capture and the importance of information technology in data collection, capture, and management
  • Describe the ICH GCP requirements for data correction and queries
  • Describe the significance of data quality assurance systems and how standard operating procedures are used to guide these processes

View Related Training

Ethical and Participant Safety Considerations

Ethical and Participant Safety Considerations

Encompasses care of patients, aspects of human subject protection, and safety in the conduct of a clinical trial.

  • Compare and contrast clinical care and clinical management of research participants
  • Define the concepts of “clinical equipoise” and “therapeutic misconception” as related to the conduct of a clinical trial
  • Compare the requirements for human subject protections and privacy under different national and international regulations and ensure their implementation throughout all phases of a clinical study
  • Explain the evolution of the requirement for informed consent from research participants and the principles and content of the key documents ensuring the protection of human participants in clinical research
  • Describe the ethical issues involved when dealing with vulnerable populations and the need for additional safeguards
  • Evaluate and apply an understanding of the past and current ethical issues, cultural variations, and commercial aspects to the medicines development process
  • Explain how inclusion and exclusion criteria are included in a clinical protocol to assure human subject protection
  • Summarize the principles and methods of distributing and balancing risk and benefit through selection and management of clinical trial subjects

View Related Training

Leadership and Professionalism

Leadership and Professionalism

Encompasses the principles and practice of leadership and professionalism in clinical research

  • Describe the principles and practices of leadership, management, and mentorship, and apply them within the working environment
  • Identify and implement procedures for the prevention or management of the ethical and professional conflicts that are associated with the conduct of clinical research
  • Identify and apply the professional guidelines and codes of ethics that apply to the conduct of clinical research
  • Describe the effect of cultural diversity and the need for cultural comp

View Related Training

Medicines Development and Regulation

Medicines Development and Regulation

Encompasses knowledge of how drugs, devices, and biologicals are developed and regulated.

  • Discuss the historical events that precipitated the development of governmental regulatory processes for drugs, devices, and biologics
  • Describe the roles and responsibilities of the various institutions participating in the medicines development process
  • Explain the medicines development process and the activities that integrate commercial realities into the life cycle management of medical products
  • Summarize the legislative and regulatory framework that supports the development and registration of medicines, devices, and biologics and ensures their safety, efficacy, and quality
  • Describe the specific processes and phases that must be followed in order for the regulatory authority to approve the marketing authorization for a medical product
  • Describe the safety reporting requirements of regulatory agencies both pre- and post-approval
  • Appraise the issues generated and the effects of global expansion on the approval and regulation of medical products

View Related Training

Scientific Concepts and Research Design

Scientific Concepts and Research Design

Encompasses knowledge of scientific concepts related to the design and analysis of clinical trials.

  • Demonstrate knowledge of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and toxicology as related to medicines discovery and development
  • Identify clinically important questions that are potentially testable clinical research hypotheses, through review of the professional literature
  • Explain the elements (statistical, epidemiological, and operational) of clinical and translational study design
  • Design a clinical trial
  • Critically analyze study results with an understanding of therapeutic and comparative effectiveness

View Related Training

Study and Site Management

Study and Site Management

Encompasses content required at the site level to run a study (financial and personnel aspects). Includes site and study operations (not encompassing regulatory/GCPs).

  • Describe the methods utilized to determine whether or not to sponsor, supervise, or participate in a clinical trial
  • Develop and manage the financial, timeline, and cross-disciplinary personnel resources necessary to conduct a clinical or translational research study
  • Apply management concepts and effective training methods to manage risk and improve quality in the conduct of a clinical research study
  • Utilize elements of project management related to organization of the study site to manage patient recruitment, complete procedures, and track progress
  • Identify the legal responsibilities, issues, liabilities, and accountabilities that are involved in the conduct of a clinical trial
  • Identify and explain the specific procedural, documentation, and oversight requirements of PIs, sponsors, contract research organizations (CROs), and regulatory authorities related to the conduct of a clinical trial

View Related Training

About the Joint Task Force

In an attempt to bring together disparate, but high-quality efforts focused on clinical trial competence, a meeting of representatives from pharmaceutical companies, contract research organizations, academic institutions, clinical research sites, and professional societies was hosted by the Multi-Regional Clinical Trial (MRCT) Center at Harvard University during spring 2013. A broad-based and widely representative group was formed and named the Joint Task Force (JTF) for Clinical Trial Competency.

The members of the JTF agreed to work toward aligning and harmonizing the many focused statements relating to core competency for clinical research professionals into a single, high-level set of standards, which could be adopted globally and serve as a framework for defining professional competency throughout the clinical research enterprise. The JTF had a second face-to-face meeting in June 2013, which included participants from an even broader representation of the clinical research community.

The JTF then worked through the summer of 2013 and presented its final report in October of that year.

The process used by the JTF was designed to acknowledge and incorporate the inputs from the many participating organizations. It required a review of the many different competency statements and identification of competency domains, or broad categories of the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to function within the field of clinical research. It determined that all of the competency statements could be aligned within the eight competency domains.

Contributors and Collaborators

  • Association of Clinical Research Professional
  • Academy of Physicians in Clinical Reserch
  • Amgen
  • Alliance for Clinical Research Excellence and Safety
  • Clinical & Translational Science Awards
  • Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative
  • Consortium of Academic Programs in Clinical Research
  • Deloitte
  • Drug Information Association
  • Global Health Network
  • Inter-American Foundation for Clinical Research
  • International Federation of Associations of Pharmaceutical Physicians
  • Korea National Enterprise for Clinical Trials
  • MAGI
  • Multi-Regional Clinical Trial Center
  • Pfizer
  • PharmaTrain
  • TransCelerate Biopharma, Inc.
  • UK Clinical Research Collaboration
Implementation

The Core Competency Framework can be used in many ways toward improving the quality and safety of the clinical research enterprise, such as to define certification criteria used by personnel or site certifying agencies. The framework also could be used to formulate accreditation standards for academic programs, both to standardize curricula and to ensure that programs are sufficiently comprehensive.

Ultimately though, the most effective method to improve clinical trials would be to ensure that those responsible for the various aspects of the clinical trial bring the appropriate competence at the appropriate time. The greater challenge is implementation of this conceptual framework into an operational model, and a good place to start could be the clinical research design, whereby a look at competencies across two different types of studies can reveal variability in requirements.

For instance, comparing an investigatorinitiated, observational trial to an industry-sponsored, premarket interventional trial illustrates how this framework might be used to qualify a PI. As depicted right, the competencies for the Study and Site Management Domain are identical in the two different styles of trial, but not so for the Scientific and Research Design Domain. This does not imply that a less competent investigator can perform an observational study, but that a lower level of competency is required for that study method. Furthermore, the level of competency might be quite different for other clinical research team roles, such as CRC, CRA, data manager, or regulatory affairs coordinator.

Once the necessary competency is defined, the PI, study sponsor, and interested regulatory authority must ensure that the study team member possesses the necessary competencies to carry out the selected, protocol-defined tasks. If additional knowledge or skills are needed, this would be the proper place to integrate with training programs that have training materials and processes that are harmonized to the protocol-specific competency requirements.

Competencies and Study Methods
Source: Clinical Researcher, June 2014
Next Steps

Meeting: Core Competencies in Clinical Research: Real World Applications, Convergance and Evolution of a Framework

The MRCT Center will host a workshop to discuss the evolution of a harmonized framework of core competencies for clinical research professionals and its application to real world experiences. Fifteen real life case studies applying the core competencies by industry, professional societies and academia in the US and global settings will be presented.

This will be an opportunity to learn more about the application of the core competencies for those seeking to apply the competencies in their own environment. Also the workshop will provide an opportunity for participants to provide feedback and discuss potential future revisions for the competency framework. Potential future projects for the work group will also be discussed.

October 19, 2016
8:30 am to 4:00 pm
Harvard Faculty Club, Reading Room, Cambridge, MA

Register

 

Workshop Agenda Lodging and Parking near MRCT Center

Recognition

The information presented here is from an article, “Moving from Compliance to Competency: A Harmonized Core Competency Framework for the Clinical Research Professional,” published in the June 2014 issue of Clinical Researcher and authored by:

  • Stephen A. Sonstein, PhD
  • Jonathan Seltzer, MD, MBA, MA, FACC
  • Rebecca Li, PhD
  • Honorio Silva, MD
  • Carolynn Thomas Jones, DNP, MSPH, RN
  • Esther Daemen, BSN, PG, PMP, MBA

Read Article